Search found 37 matches
- Wed Jun 11, 2014 9:52 am
- Forum: Stocks
- Topic: Selecting a Portfolio
- Replies: 7
- Views: 14743
Hi Sluggo - appreciate the reply. Today my approach is I've created the s&p 500 using all constituents from the past ten years with a filter that says ignore security X if it was before Y date (any date prior to bring added to S&P. But is using the S&P a good/practice/logical approach? Is it better ...
- Tue Jun 10, 2014 8:47 pm
- Forum: Stocks
- Topic: Selecting a Portfolio
- Replies: 7
- Views: 14743
Selecting a Portfolio
I was looking to get some direction/thoughts on creating an equities portfolio geared toward a long term trend following strategy.
I'm assuming there is some sort of rhyme and reason to selecting stocks to include in such a basket...or is there? Does it make most
sense to just use the S&P 500 ...
I'm assuming there is some sort of rhyme and reason to selecting stocks to include in such a basket...or is there? Does it make most
sense to just use the S&P 500 ...
- Wed Apr 02, 2014 12:21 pm
- Forum: Testing and Simulation
- Topic: Using Delisted Data
- Replies: 11
- Views: 13603
- Wed Apr 02, 2014 12:14 pm
- Forum: Testing and Simulation
- Topic: Using Delisted Data
- Replies: 11
- Views: 13603
- Tue Apr 01, 2014 9:05 pm
- Forum: Testing and Simulation
- Topic: Using Delisted Data
- Replies: 11
- Views: 13603
- Fri Feb 21, 2014 8:57 am
- Forum: Testing and Simulation
- Topic: Triple Moving Average Experience
- Replies: 36
- Views: 49913
- Fri Feb 21, 2014 7:46 am
- Forum: Testing and Simulation
- Topic: Triple Moving Average Experience
- Replies: 36
- Views: 49913
- Thu Feb 20, 2014 10:49 pm
- Forum: Testing and Simulation
- Topic: Triple Moving Average Experience
- Replies: 36
- Views: 49913
- Tue Nov 12, 2013 5:42 pm
- Forum: Testing and Simulation
- Topic: Robust
- Replies: 6
- Views: 9114
I agree with your comment an have takin this in to account by editing the portfolio to include only those securities that haven't changed over the past 10 years. What I'm trying to understand is if the strategy isn't robust because it works well on S&P but not as well on Russell 2000. Not sure if ...
- Tue Nov 12, 2013 2:13 pm
- Forum: Testing and Simulation
- Topic: Robust
- Replies: 6
- Views: 9114
- Tue Nov 12, 2013 1:51 pm
- Forum: Testing and Simulation
- Topic: Robust
- Replies: 6
- Views: 9114
- Tue Nov 12, 2013 8:18 am
- Forum: Testing and Simulation
- Topic: Slippage
- Replies: 2
- Views: 4676
- Mon Nov 11, 2013 10:01 pm
- Forum: Testing and Simulation
- Topic: Robust
- Replies: 6
- Views: 9114
Robust
When back test my strategy against the S&P 500 over a 10 year period it does extremely well. When I test the same strategy against the Russell 2000 it doesn't perform as well; same with NASDAQ. Can this be due to the fact that the S&P 500 is a diversified weighted portfolio and the the Russell for ...
- Mon Nov 11, 2013 7:10 pm
- Forum: Testing and Simulation
- Topic: Slippage
- Replies: 2
- Views: 4676
Slippage
Does anyone have a slippage % that they use in test that is pretty accurate/standard for trading equities that can/should be used for back testing?
- Mon Nov 11, 2013 2:51 pm
- Forum: Testing and Simulation
- Topic: Triple Moving Average Experience
- Replies: 36
- Views: 49913
- Mon Nov 11, 2013 10:56 am
- Forum: Testing and Simulation
- Topic: Triple Moving Average Experience
- Replies: 36
- Views: 49913
Thanks Jake - makes sense. Hoping you can help with this question. I'm having a difficult time understanding why risking 1% vs. .1% per trade would result in CAGR not being the same everything else held constant. The statistics on both tests are almost identical with the exception of CAGR and ending ...
- Sun Nov 10, 2013 11:14 pm
- Forum: Testing and Simulation
- Topic: Triple Moving Average Experience
- Replies: 36
- Views: 49913
I'm using starting equity of $250,000, Order Risk Per Trade (%) = 1%. How does the $2,500 really become my "risk" per trade? The amount i'd lose based on the stop loss order generation for my first trade (below) is $3233.01 ([Entry Price - Stop Loss] * quantity). That $2,500 isn't really the risk to ...
- Tue Oct 29, 2013 9:33 pm
- Forum: Testing and Simulation
- Topic: Trading Next Days Open
- Replies: 14
- Views: 18140
- Sun Oct 27, 2013 9:58 pm
- Forum: Testing and Simulation
- Topic: Trading Next Days Open
- Replies: 14
- Views: 18140
- Tue Oct 22, 2013 6:30 pm
- Forum: Testing and Simulation
- Topic: Triple Moving Average Experience
- Replies: 36
- Views: 49913
Hey thanks for replying. I see where you are going with your thought but I was thinking something a little different. I'm already using a long term trend following strategy. Assuming today is day one of my brokerage account, if I click generate orders I'm presented with potential positions to enter ...