Search found 35 matches
- Wed Jun 04, 2014 11:16 am
- Forum: Data Providers and other non testing software
- Topic: Portara & CQG Datafactory - Professional Data Service
- Replies: 17
- Views: 32710
Our Firm has been beta testing Portara for the past two years or so and I can honestly say that it is the most versatile price data management solution for futures data that we have come across. The ability to create daily bars based on custom start and end times is a game changer. The decision to ...
- Tue Aug 26, 2008 1:35 pm
- Forum: Testing and Simulation
- Topic: Robustness vrs New Markets
- Replies: 9
- Views: 10427
Good point AFJ. A while back, I had written an alternate version of the "instrument.tradingInstruments" property which eliminates the "have price information for the current test date" condition. As a result, markets that are closed due to a Holiday (or weekend) are not excluded from the calculation ...
- Tue Aug 26, 2008 8:54 am
- Forum: Testing and Simulation
- Topic: Robustness vrs New Markets
- Replies: 9
- Views: 10427
- Thu Jun 26, 2008 10:57 am
- Forum: Testing and Simulation
- Topic: WARNING: Potential problem with CSI Unadjusted Close field
- Replies: 12
- Views: 13289
- Tue Jun 24, 2008 5:31 pm
- Forum: Testing and Simulation
- Topic: WARNING: Potential problem with CSI Unadjusted Close field
- Replies: 12
- Views: 13289
- Fri Jun 06, 2008 5:05 am
- Forum: Testing and Simulation
- Topic: WARNING: Potential problem with CSI Unadjusted Close field
- Replies: 12
- Views: 13289
- Thu Jun 05, 2008 6:35 pm
- Forum: Testing and Simulation
- Topic: WARNING: Potential problem with CSI Unadjusted Close field
- Replies: 12
- Views: 13289
WARNING: Potential problem with CSI Unadjusted Close field
I recently started scrutinizing the unadjusted close data generated by CSI UA ASCII field layout option "U" (Futures data only). Assuming that there are no specific issues with the versions of UA I tried (i.e. 2.9.3 and 2.10.3), there appears to be a serious problem with the unadjusted close data ...
- Fri Apr 06, 2007 7:32 am
- Forum: Testing and Simulation
- Topic: Cats out of the BAG LTTF VS SWINGING
- Replies: 34
- Views: 51347
- Thu Apr 05, 2007 10:58 pm
- Forum: Testing and Simulation
- Topic: Cats out of the BAG LTTF VS SWINGING
- Replies: 34
- Views: 51347
- Thu Apr 05, 2007 10:14 pm
- Forum: Testing and Simulation
- Topic: Cats out of the BAG LTTF VS SWINGING
- Replies: 34
- Views: 51347
jankiraly - I never meant to imply that one should always trade on the open.
Hiring traders or purchasing/outsourcing to/leasing an Algorithmic trading solution to minimize market impact costs is easier said than done. It is akin to allocating a portion of your capital to a high frequency trading ...
Hiring traders or purchasing/outsourcing to/leasing an Algorithmic trading solution to minimize market impact costs is easier said than done. It is akin to allocating a portion of your capital to a high frequency trading ...
- Wed Apr 04, 2007 4:37 pm
- Forum: Testing and Simulation
- Topic: Cats out of the BAG LTTF VS SWINGING
- Replies: 34
- Views: 51347
- Wed Apr 04, 2007 4:06 pm
- Forum: Testing and Simulation
- Topic: Cats out of the BAG LTTF VS SWINGING
- Replies: 34
- Views: 51347
- Wed Apr 04, 2007 10:53 am
- Forum: Testing and Simulation
- Topic: Cats out of the BAG LTTF VS SWINGING
- Replies: 34
- Views: 51347
- Tue Mar 27, 2007 12:45 pm
- Forum: Money Management
- Topic: How Many Systems are Enough?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 10853
AFJ - assuming that you have an exposure cap by sector or sub-sector (e.g. max x% to equity index futures or max y% cap to European equity index futures), it probably makes sense to allocate to as many markets as possible within each sector/sub-sector subject to account size constraints (i.e. an ...
- Mon Mar 26, 2007 11:38 am
- Forum: Testing and Simulation
- Topic: Test results: 4 different entries + Random Exits
- Replies: 21
- Views: 58909
- Fri Mar 23, 2007 5:20 pm
- Forum: Testing and Simulation
- Topic: In your experience as a system trader... 80/40 or 40/40 ?
- Replies: 46
- Views: 69181
- Fri Mar 23, 2007 3:31 pm
- Forum: Testing and Simulation
- Topic: In your experience as a system trader... 80/40 or 40/40 ?
- Replies: 46
- Views: 69181
- Fri Mar 23, 2007 3:09 pm
- Forum: Testing and Simulation
- Topic: Your advice: what's a reasonable way to test RANDOM EXITS?
- Replies: 13
- Views: 19182
- Thu Mar 01, 2007 9:01 am
- Forum: Testing and Simulation
- Topic: In your experience as a system trader... 80/40 or 40/40 ?
- Replies: 46
- Views: 69181
- Wed Feb 28, 2007 4:40 pm
- Forum: Testing and Simulation
- Topic: In your experience as a system trader... 80/40 or 40/40 ?
- Replies: 46
- Views: 69181
How about the use of randomized portfolios instead of synthetic data as a means of testing system robustness?
About a year ago, I wrote a Portfolio Manager blox which generates random portfolios based on specific sector constraints (see attached). The sector names must be in a specific format and ...
About a year ago, I wrote a Portfolio Manager blox which generates random portfolios based on specific sector constraints (see attached). The sector names must be in a specific format and ...