Here's the story on Bloomberg.com:
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-08-1 ... lysis.html
The website doesn't have the pic, I think, but I've seen it on the Bloomberg terminal. Basically after economic collapse started, the commodity index tracks movements in the S&P 500 remarkably closely.
Supposed to be independent, no?
Scary weird stuff . . .
commodities = stocks?
It's not easy to find historical data for the GSCI cash index, so I just used the prices of the nearest futures contract as a proxy.
I multiplied the GSCI by 1.963 so both series can appear on the same scale.
(1.963 is the ratio of the geometric mean returns of the two series)
EDIT - uploaded new revision of spreadsheet, which calculates daily returns and displays them on a scatter plot
I multiplied the GSCI by 1.963 so both series can appear on the same scale.
(1.963 is the ratio of the geometric mean returns of the two series)
EDIT - uploaded new revision of spreadsheet, which calculates daily returns and displays them on a scatter plot
- Attachments
-
- sp_gsci_v2.xls
- The raw data (spreadsheet) - revised to include daily returns
- (154.5 KiB) Downloaded 316 times
-
- Comparison plot
- sp_gsci.png (31.54 KiB) Viewed 3873 times
Last edited by sluggo on Fri Aug 13, 2010 8:29 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 28
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 5:36 pm
thanks - that's the pic.
But what does it mean?
I'm not sure.
With a touch of fundamentals, here's a guess: Commodities trade based on supply and demand - ultimately. Psychology, other traders, systems, over the long enough haul it all comes out in the wash. But . . . this assumes a functional economic system underlying it all so that the commodities have value within that system. Presumably the economic system is a given nearly all the time, so it doesn't impact prices. However if you start to worry about the economy itself in a truly fundamental way, then the values of the commodities take on a new variable in the form of whether there will be a robust enough underlying society to make use of (and hence give value to) commodities.
In other words, commodities tracking the S&P like this is scary --- no? Maybe it's why trend following is having a tough time now, until things settle down and decouple, we are living during very "interesting" times . . . ?
But what does it mean?
I'm not sure.
With a touch of fundamentals, here's a guess: Commodities trade based on supply and demand - ultimately. Psychology, other traders, systems, over the long enough haul it all comes out in the wash. But . . . this assumes a functional economic system underlying it all so that the commodities have value within that system. Presumably the economic system is a given nearly all the time, so it doesn't impact prices. However if you start to worry about the economy itself in a truly fundamental way, then the values of the commodities take on a new variable in the form of whether there will be a robust enough underlying society to make use of (and hence give value to) commodities.
In other words, commodities tracking the S&P like this is scary --- no? Maybe it's why trend following is having a tough time now, until things settle down and decouple, we are living during very "interesting" times . . . ?