Paul Tudor Jones and 1987 crash

General discussions about futures.
Post Reply
billpritjr
Roundtable Fellow
Roundtable Fellow
Posts: 93
Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 1:17 am
Location: Ft. Worth, Texas

Paul Tudor Jones and 1987 crash

Post by billpritjr »

I re-read Market Wizards for the 88th time and observed that Paul Tudor Jones claimed to have gone big T-Bonds when he and Peter Borish "saw" the coming 1987 stock market crash.

However, unless I am missing something, a check of historical T-Bond charts for 1987-1988 do not show any huge uptrends, immediately following the Oct '87 crash.

Am I missing something?

Thanks
BARLI
Roundtable Knight
Roundtable Knight
Posts: 650
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2004 6:01 pm
Location: USA

Post by BARLI »

you are really missing something here :wink:


take a look at a chart:

Image

Bonds rallied 10 points during next 4 days right after the day of the crash
billpritjr
Roundtable Fellow
Roundtable Fellow
Posts: 93
Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 1:17 am
Location: Ft. Worth, Texas

Post by billpritjr »

OK good, thanks. I was unable to find that online or with my charts that I use.

I wonder how short he was also. Long T-Bonds and short SP futures maybe.

His partner, Peter Borish, "called' the crash, but anyone can buy William O'Neils books, written for the average investor, and O'Neil also saw the crash coming, almost to the day.
edward kim
Roundtable Knight
Roundtable Knight
Posts: 344
Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2003 2:42 pm
Location: Silicon Valley / San Jose, CA USA
Contact:

Re: Paul Tudor Jones and 1987 crash

Post by edward kim »

billpritjr wrote:I re-read Market Wizards for the 88th time and observed that Paul Tudor Jones claimed to have gone big T-Bonds when he and Peter Borish "saw" the coming 1987 stock market crash.

However, unless I am missing something, a check of historical T-Bond charts for 1987-1988 do not show any huge uptrends, immediately following the Oct '87 crash.

Am I missing something?

Thanks
yes.

they did an analog model to the 1929 stock market and realized a high degree of correlation.

they guessed right on the liquidity infusion which is the only thing that was different.
Post Reply