I have been doing considerable historical testing with the various systems. What is interesting is the performance gets chopped away with every new time frame.
For instance for one of the systems, the periods of:
1970-1980 =CAGR OF 70%
1980-1990= CAGR OF 58%
1990-2003= CAGR OF 20%
i am certain ...
Search found 6 matches
- Sun Feb 01, 2004 11:49 pm
- Forum: Testing and Simulation
- Topic: Performance over historical time frames
- Replies: 2
- Views: 4781
- Fri Jan 30, 2004 1:37 am
- Forum: Money Management
- Topic: Margin To Equity - Futures portfolios
- Replies: 14
- Views: 35715
- Tue Jan 27, 2004 11:20 pm
- Forum: Testing and Simulation
- Topic: Turtle 1 and Turtle 2
- Replies: 6
- Views: 8547
- Tue Jan 27, 2004 11:02 pm
- Forum: Testing and Simulation
- Topic: Turtle 1 and Turtle 2
- Replies: 6
- Views: 8547
- Tue Jan 27, 2004 3:54 pm
- Forum: Testing and Simulation
- Topic: Turtle 1 and Turtle 2
- Replies: 6
- Views: 8547
Thanks Forum Mgmnt, it appears the higher MAR's can be achieved by going with the smaller demo portfolio rather than the origina larger turtle portfolio. I assume this demo portfolio was selected because these futures are more trending than the Turtle portfolio? (more of a curved fit?)
I wanted to ...
I wanted to ...
- Tue Jan 27, 2004 2:55 pm
- Forum: Testing and Simulation
- Topic: Turtle 1 and Turtle 2
- Replies: 6
- Views: 8547
Turtle 1 and Turtle 2
Does it make any sense to run these two systems at the same time? It seems that Turtle One has the "fail safe" breakout option. With that in place and running Turtle 2, would they not be basically duplicating themselves at the 55 period breakout?
Or am I missing something obvious?