Chris,
Have you tested your 1 in 10,000 claim? Perhaps we should take a poll on this forum. We’ll need at least 10,000 (many more would be better) newbies with excellent system design experience, knowledge of the markets, but with no trading experience, and, say, $100,000 of their own money to ...
Search found 10 matches
- Thu Jan 15, 2004 11:18 pm
- Forum: Money Management
- Topic: The Myth of Mathematics
- Replies: 8
- Views: 14532
- Tue Jan 13, 2004 9:53 pm
- Forum: Trader Psychology
- Topic: Would you have invested?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 9401
- Tue Jan 13, 2004 9:50 pm
- Forum: Trader Psychology
- Topic: What motivates us???
- Replies: 8
- Views: 14534
- Tue Jan 13, 2004 9:22 pm
- Forum: Trader Psychology
- Topic: Too much reading ...
- Replies: 58
- Views: 95850
- Thu Jan 08, 2004 10:01 pm
- Forum: Futures Markets
- Topic: How are people executing futures trades?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 10940
- Wed Jan 07, 2004 7:54 pm
- Forum: Money Management
- Topic: Ryan Jones' Money Management
- Replies: 33
- Views: 59426
- Tue Jan 06, 2004 8:49 pm
- Forum: Testing and Simulation
- Topic: Improve Risk:Reward by using different time frames?
- Replies: 20
- Views: 39815
I suppose the shorter term system traders would typically trade more contracts than when it morphs into its longer term Green Hulk. So one would have to either trim down the size (make the position smaller to account for the widened stop) or trade the smaller number in the short term system with ...
- Tue Jan 06, 2004 5:20 pm
- Forum: Testing and Simulation
- Topic: Improve Risk:Reward by using different time frames?
- Replies: 20
- Views: 39815
Back to the original thread: Improve Risk:Reward by using different time frames?
This actually makes very good sense to me. Think about volatility – volatility is a function of time. Movement per unit time. So why not think about risk in the same way? Most of us likely already do because we link ...
This actually makes very good sense to me. Think about volatility – volatility is a function of time. Movement per unit time. So why not think about risk in the same way? Most of us likely already do because we link ...