%Risk vs %Vol or Both

Discussions about Money Management and Risk Control.
Post Reply
Sir G
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 243
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2003 12:21 am
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah

%Risk vs %Vol or Both

Post by Sir G » Tue May 06, 2003 11:32 pm

What are the benefits to position sizing with %Risk & %Vol? Is one better for LT systems and one better for ST systems? In general is one better then the other, or should they be combined?

Gordon

Bondtrader
Roundtable Knight
Roundtable Knight
Posts: 101
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2003 11:07 am
Location: Zimbabwe

Post by Bondtrader » Wed May 07, 2003 8:52 am

Gordon I notice that you ask lots of questions that you could in fact answer yourself, by running tests. Why not "learn by doing", why not test? I expect you'll agree that the VeriTrader software is a wonderful bargain and tremendously easy to use, why not run it? Then you could start posting answers instead of questions.

I'll give you a little nudge in the right direction for this %Vol / %Risk inquiry of yours: Apply each of them to a Donchian Channel Breakout system, then apply each of them to a Moving Average Crossover system. Step back and look at your code. Taa-daa! the answer jumps off the page!

rgds, BT

damian
Roundtable Knight
Roundtable Knight
Posts: 815
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2003 8:43 pm
Location: dusseldorf

Post by damian » Wed May 07, 2003 9:00 am

BondTrader,

I think our mate Gordon the Moderator is prompting discussion threads and thought.

I can't speak for him, but I wouldn't be surprised if he has some answers to his questions (via testing) and would like to build up his understanding, verify his findings, test his beliefs etc via open conversation on this forum.

He poses some excellent topics for discussion. I seldom am able respond as I do not have an answer. However each time I see one of Gordons "what do you think?" posts, I note it down as a worthy avenue of investigation as most of his questions are questions I have not yet asked myself.

cheers
damian

edward kim
Roundtable Knight
Roundtable Knight
Posts: 344
Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2003 2:42 pm
Location: Silicon Valley / San Jose, CA USA
Contact:

Post by edward kim » Wed May 07, 2003 3:46 pm

Posing a question also gives us further opportunity to expand on a topic than originally intended. Here is what works for my system (R=risk, V=volatility):

1. V is a condition I use for initial R
2. R has more influence for ST systems, while V has a greater impact on LT systems
3. %R has more impact than %V for entries
4. V has more impact on performance than R for exits

Sir G's question gave me an idea about an asymmetric bias in the market topic that I can start on another thread.

Edward
Last edited by edward kim on Wed May 07, 2003 11:54 pm, edited 2 times in total.

CRM114
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 35
Joined: Tue May 06, 2003 7:51 pm
Location: Florida

Post by CRM114 » Wed May 07, 2003 10:48 pm

I think our mate Gordon the Moderator is prompting discussion threads and thought.
damian, that was my first thought, too. However, after being conditioned by other sites, my second thought was that Bondtrader was in for some serious flaming. :twisted:

What a pleasure it is to visit this site. It's an oasis of civility. :D

Thanks everyone.

Post Reply