Search found 66 matches
- Thu Mar 01, 2007 9:34 am
- Forum: Testing and Simulation
- Topic: Stock Data with Fundamental
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3751
- Tue Nov 21, 2006 3:37 pm
- Forum: Testing Software
- Topic: Apple versus PC's
- Replies: 27
- Views: 47059
I echo painless's comments. The Apple machines and OS are much better then any wintel machine; however, most software is written for Windows. Plus, it really depends on your plans for the machine. Will this machine be used for everyday use and for system testing or system testing only? System testin...
- Fri Jun 16, 2006 2:51 pm
- Forum: Testing and Simulation
- Topic: Optimization question
- Replies: 21
- Views: 17205
- Thu Jun 15, 2006 2:48 pm
- Forum: Testing and Simulation
- Topic: Optimization question
- Replies: 21
- Views: 17205
From the link below it seems that the chassis temp should not go above 38 C and about 72 C for the CPU it self. This is a little bit old but it should be pretty close.
http://www.tomshardware.com/2004/11/14/ ... page3.html
http://www.tomshardware.com/2004/11/14/ ... page3.html
- Wed Jun 14, 2006 3:54 pm
- Forum: Testing and Simulation
- Topic: Optimization question
- Replies: 21
- Views: 17205
By system tool do you mean the testing software? I think you miss read my post. If you keep your system Cool, don't let the cpu get too hot then it would not be a problem. As far as the memory upgrade goes ... It definitly would not hurt, but my guess is that the optimization is more CPU bound then...
- Wed Jun 14, 2006 9:32 am
- Forum: Testing and Simulation
- Topic: Optimization question
- Replies: 21
- Views: 17205
I can't comment on the testing vs. Monte Carlo, but I can offer suggestions about 90% cpu usage. As long as you can keep your system cool, it should be able to handle that amount a load. I say should because I don't know any info on your machine. Labs all over the world string together 10s and 100s ...