Search found 5 matches
- Sat Apr 02, 2011 5:16 pm
- Forum: Testing and Simulation
- Topic: Dollar Volume vs Plain Volume
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3886
i understand your example, but given that more dollars exchanged hands doesn't mean that the specific commodity/stock itself had been purchased/sold more times. Isn't the interest/volume in the stock the basis for liquidity? It seems that using dollar-volume just dilutes the meaning of liquidity its...
- Sat Apr 02, 2011 9:02 am
- Forum: Testing and Simulation
- Topic: Dollar Volume vs Plain Volume
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3886
Dollar Volume vs Plain Volume
After reading about some posts and articles about utilizing dollar volume to focus on more liquid stocks, I still don't quite grasp the significance of avg dollar volume vs plain avg volume. I am assuming/thinking: traders who worry about liquidity usually refer to the ability to in/out without exce...
- Tue Mar 02, 2010 3:16 pm
- Forum: Testing and Simulation
- Topic: CSI Data LME Nickel contract error
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2500
- Fri Feb 26, 2010 9:50 pm
- Forum: Testing and Simulation
- Topic: CSI Data LME Nickel contract error
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2500
thank you sluggo, as always your posts are very informative and appreciated :) I was just in the midst of coding a program to look for these discrepancies, but i won't try to reinvent the wheel Thanks again for the link and creating that blox. While it irks me (and i'm sure everyone else) to find th...
- Fri Feb 26, 2010 8:33 pm
- Forum: Testing and Simulation
- Topic: CSI Data LME Nickel contract error
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2500
CSI Data LME Nickel contract error
If you guys see a huge cliff around 20020203 in your tests and include the LME nickel contract then this may be why: notice the extra zeros...I have contacted CSI about this almost 2 weeks ago and was told that they would put it in the correction file...however I just updated my data a few seconds a...